How Complaints Enter the System
One primary complaint at a time. If the customer has multiple concerns, the most pressing one drives routing. Vehicle complaints always take priority. Secondary concerns are captured as a flag and followed up when the primary complaint resolves.
Customer Issue Form
Vehicle + Collected → SQ Complaint
Full triage fields populate. Acknowledgement letter fires. Handler assigned. Record lands in SRC > Triage Complaint with everything filled in.
Vehicle + Not Collected → Unwind
Pre-collection cancellation. Unwind Category auto-sets to Non-Collection. Retentions picks it up for a retention attempt before processing the unwind.
Dealership's Service → Dealer Forwarding
Not a regulated complaint against CL365. Forwarded to the dealer with a notification email. If unresolved, customer can escalate to a regulated complaint.
CL365's Service → Regulated Complaint
FCA-regulated under DISP. 8-week clock starts. Acknowledgement letter fires immediately. Full investigation with detriment and liability assessment.
When the primary complaint closes, an automated task fires if secondary concerns were flagged: "Primary complaint resolved. Customer also raised concerns about [X]. Confirm whether a separate complaint is needed." The handler calls the customer. If yes, a new case is logged. If no, the task is closed.
SQ Complaint Flow
Pipeline 1 — SRC Early Resolution
Pipeline 2 — Investigation
Post-6-month complaints: If the vehicle was purchased more than 6 months ago, a different evidence request fires. It explains that supporting diagnostics are needed because the burden of proof shifts to the customer. The post-6-month customer help guide is attached. See Section 5 for full details.
The assessment uses the CRA Rights Matrix to determine the customer's rights based on vehicle age from sale. This shapes whether a repair, reject, or evidence-led path applies.
Pipeline 3 — Upheld - Pending Resolution
⤷ Auto-creates Unwind record → Awaiting Funds > ROA Processing (skips retention)
⤷ Auto-creates Unwind + Legal records
Every stage transition is driven by a form submission. When a handler completes a form, the system knows what happened and what to do next. Fields populate automatically. Emails fire automatically. Records move automatically. Without the forms, none of this works — the system has no data to act on. If a handler skips a form and manually drags a record to a different stage, the automations won't fire and the data won't be captured.
Service Complaints Flow
Pipeline 1 — Dealer Forwarding
Pipeline 2 — Regulated Complaint
1. Has the customer experienced genuine detriment? Financial loss, distress and inconvenience, or both. No detriment = cannot uphold, even if we made a mistake.
2. Is CarLoans365 responsible? Did we cause it through our actions or inaction? Customer may have a real problem, but if the cause sits with the dealer, the lender, or the customer — it's not our liability.
Both must be "yes" for a complaint to be upheld. This is what FOS will scrutinise.
CRA Rights by Vehicle Age
Within 30 Days
Did the fault exist at sale? Short-term rejection may apply. Highly sensitive to delays. If rejection/unwind is accepted, hand off promptly to Retentions for implementation.
Agent focus: Immediate action. Diagnosis and dealer's willingness to accept return or repair. Fast-track to manager if dealer disputes.
31 – 90 Days
Still within first 6 months. Dealer has one opportunity to repair or replace. Burden of proof is on the dealer to show the fault wasn't present at sale.
Agent focus: Book the repair. Manage expectations that the dealer leads the fix. Escalate if repair fails or takes an unreasonable amount of time.
91 Days – 6 Months
Burden of proof generally still rests with the dealer. Wear and tear becomes a factor. Independent Engineer Report often required if dealer disputes liability.
Agent focus: Gather diagnostic evidence and wear & tear assessment. IER if the dealer cites driving style or wear.
Over 6 Months
Burden of proof shifts to the customer. They must evidence that the fault existed at the point of sale. Move to a structured evidence-led path. Send the post-6-month customer help guide immediately.
Agent focus: Set clear, supportive expectations. Explain what evidence is needed. Do not authorise IER spend unless directed by Complaints Manager. If evidence is not provided, manage via the no contact / no cooperation process.
Two checks at intake: capture Delivery/Sale Date and Fault First Reported Date so EL can calculate vehicle age. Then open the correct complaint diary. These are separate clocks — the CRA age band tells you what rights apply, the DISP diary tells you how long you've got to resolve the complaint.
Post-6-Month Evidence Path
What Changes After 6 Months
The standard evidence request email is replaced with a post-6-month version that explains why more information is needed and what types of evidence are most helpful. The customer help guide is attached — it walks them through getting an independent diagnostic report, what the garage should include, and what happens next. The tone is supportive, not adversarial.
The evidence that matters most:
| Evidence Type | Why It Helps |
|---|---|
| Independent diagnostic report | Shows exactly what the fault is, likely cause, and whether it was present at sale |
| Fault codes / mechanic's notes | Technical details of the problem |
| Photos or videos | Visual confirmation of the issue |
| Service and MOT history | Shows the car has been maintained — rules out neglect |
| Repair quotes or bills | What's needed to fix it and at what cost |
| Breakdown / recovery reports | Confirms what happened if the car failed on the road |
| Timeline of events | When the problem started and how it progressed |
If evidence never arrives: Follow the no contact / no cooperation process. Send reminders, warn that a decision will be made on available information, and keep the complaint within DISP timing. The case can be reopened if evidence is provided later.
No Contact / No Cooperation
| Step | Action | Template |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Issue clear evidence request with a reasonable return date | Evidence Request Email (standard or post-6-month) |
| 2 | Send reminder after deadline passes. Log all chase attempts. | No Contact / Evidence Reminder |
| 3 | Warn the customer that the case may be assessed on available information if nothing is received | No Contact / Evidence Reminder (2nd) |
| 4 | If still no response, assess the complaint on what you have and issue the appropriate response | No Contact / Evidence Not Provided Outcome |
| 5 | If evidence later arrives, reopen and review | Reopen Confirmation |
The key principle: never let the diary drift. Even if the customer has gone silent, the DISP clock is still ticking. Log every chase attempt, every email, every call. If FOS asks why the complaint took 10 weeks, "the customer didn't respond" only works if you can show you chased consistently and warned them before closing.
Communications Reference
SQ Complaint Flow — Automated
| Template | Fires When | To | Auto? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Acknowledgement Letter | Triage Form submitted | Customer | ✓ |
| SRC Initial Dealer Notification | Entry to Awaiting Dealer Response | Dealer | ✓ |
| SRC Summary Resolution Communication | SRC closure | Customer | ✓ |
| Evidence Request Email | Entry to Awaiting Evidence | Customer | ✓ |
| Evidence Request WhatsApp | Entry to Awaiting Evidence | Customer | ✓ |
| Post-SRC Dealer Notification | Assessment = Upheld | Dealer | ✓ |
| Resolution Arrangement Confirmation | Resolution arranged | Customer + Dealer | ✓ |
| Dealer Dispute Rejected / Indemnity | Dispute = Remains Upheld | Dealer | ✓ |
| Final Response (Not Upheld) | Closure as Not Upheld | Customer | ✓ |
| Final Response (Resolved Upheld) | Closure as Resolved | Customer | ✓ |
SQ Complaint Flow — Manual (handler sends from template library)
| Template | Used When | To |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Progress Update | Keeping customer informed during triage/investigation | Customer |
| Repair Booked Confirmation | Dealer has scheduled repair/inspection | Customer |
| Dealer Chase | Following up with dealer for overdue update | Dealer |
| Post-6-Month Evidence Request | Vehicle > 6 months — different evidence request | Customer |
| Post-6-Month Customer Help Guide | Attached with evidence request for older vehicles | Customer |
| No Contact Reminder | Customer not responding to evidence request | Customer |
| No Contact Final Warning | Last chance before assessing on available info | Customer |
| No Contact Closure | Closing due to no engagement | Customer |
| Resolution Offer | Presenting proposed outcome | Customer |
| Dealer Recharge / Recovery | Recovering costs from dealer post-resolution | Dealer |
Service Complaints — Automated
| Template | Fires When | To | DISP? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dealer Forwarding Notification | Forwarding Form submitted | Dealer | No |
| Regulated Complaint Acknowledgement | Regulated Log Form submitted | Customer | Yes |
| Final Response Letter (Upheld) | FRL Form, Upheld/Partial | Customer | Yes |
| Final Response Letter (Not Upheld) | FRL Form, Not Upheld | Customer | Yes |
| Holding Letter | Manual — approaching 8 weeks | Customer | Yes |
Unwind + Legal — Automated
| Template | Fires When | To |
|---|---|---|
| Dealer ROA (Complaint / Non-Collection) | ROA Form submitted | Dealer |
| Lender Unwind Request (Complaint / Non-Collection) | ROA Form submitted | Lender |
| Letter Before Action | LBA Form submitted at Informal Recovery | Dealer |
Call Scripts
Customer Intake
Multiple Concerns
Dealer First Contact
Dealer Chase
Escalation to Formal Complaint
Post-6-Month Evidence
No Contact / Evidence Reminder
Resolution Offer
Dealer Forwarding Explanation
Cross-Workflow Connections
SQ Complaint → Unwind Flow
When a complaint closes as Resolved Rejection or Unresolved Rejection, a record is automatically created in the Unwind Flow. Because the complaint has already been fully investigated and the customer has been through SRC and retention discussions, the unwind record skips Investigation & Retention entirely and lands directly in Awaiting Funds > ROA Processing.
Unwind → Legal Escalation
When an unwind closes as Unresolved (shortfall, dealer didn't pay), a record is automatically created in the Legal Escalation Flow. The handler starts at Debt Triage with all data carried across — dealer, amount owed, unwind reference, complaint reference.
Dealer Forwarding → Regulated Complaint
When a dealer forwarding complaint isn't resolved and the customer wants to escalate, the handler moves the record from Dealer Forwarding > Awaiting Dealer Response into Regulated Complaint > Acknowledged. The Regulated Complaint Log Form captures the complaint details and the DISP clock starts.
Complaint → customer raises issue → SRC attempt → investigation → upheld or not → resolution or rejection
Unwind → rejection triggers unwind (skips retention) → ROA to dealer → chase funds → reimburse lender
Legal → dealer doesn't pay → informal chase → LBA → courtesy call → MCOL → enforcement
Every handoff is automatic. Every form pre-populates from upstream. The handler never starts from scratch.
Operating Principles
Dealer-First Resolution
Always try to achieve a fast dealer-led fix before formalising a complaint. The 3-day triage window exists for a reason — most vehicle issues can be resolved without a formal complaint if the dealer acts quickly.
Speed & Visibility
Chase daily during triage. Keep the customer copied into dealer communications. Customers tolerate problems — they don't tolerate silence. A progress update email takes 30 seconds and prevents an escalation.
Escalate Only When Needed
Delay, refusal, dispute, or no progress from the dealer are the only triggers for formal SQ complaint ownership. Don't escalate prematurely — it adds time, cost, and complexity that could have been avoided.
Forms Drive Everything
Every stage transition should be driven by a form submission. Forms populate custom fields. Custom fields fire automations. Automations send emails and create tasks. Skip the form and the whole chain breaks.
Diary Discipline
Where customers don't respond, keep the case moving. Document every decision within DISP timing. "The customer didn't reply" is only a defence if you can show you chased consistently and warned them before closing.
Commercial Approach
Work toward repair, contribution, or other sensible resolution steps. Where rejection/unwind is accepted, hand off promptly to Retentions. Protect re-deal opportunities. Recover costs from dealers immediately after resolution.
Rights Clarity
Use the CRA rights matrix as a practical guide at the investigation stage. Don't overstate legal rights in customer communications. Escalate complex matters for compliance review.
Migrated Records
Legacy complaints from AutoConvert have "MIGRATED" in the Initial SQ Complaint Summary field. Automated emails won't fire for these records. Handle communications manually until they close out. New complaints from the Customer Issue Form work fully automatically.
carloans365 · Complaints Training · May 2026